The refs decision was awful but did it really make a difference? They didn't
score the palanty and, even if he'd given a fouls outside the box, he was last defender and would still have been sent off.
Only thing you could say I supose is, was it a fouls at all?
Posted By: CB41 on August 22nd 2011 at 09:50:34
Message Thread
- The refs decision was awful but did it really make a difference? They didn't (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 22, 09:50:34
- How can having one less player not make a difference ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 22, 10:41:03
- Err, of course it makes a difference. What I said is that we would still have been one (NCFC) - CB41, Aug 22, 11:05:29
- minimum contact really. (n/m) (NCFC) - UtterlyHuckerby, Aug 22, 09:53:15
- it wasn't a foul (NCFC) - Brandonio, Aug 22, 09:53:05
- pretty much always given tho (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 22, 09:55:15
- Naive defending, you can't make contact with the player in those areas. (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 22, 10:02:09
- Agreed, once he's behind the man and ball he's in trouble. That needed launching into (NCFC) - megson, Aug 22, 12:01:32
- yep, hopefully we'll learn (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Aug 22, 10:33:42
- Had the penalty incident been between Vidic defending (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Aug 22, 10:30:05
- Barnett seems a bit thick tbh. (NCFC) - lurd, Aug 22, 10:29:05
- Naive defending, you can't make contact with the player in those areas. (NCFC) - phrankin, Aug 22, 10:02:09
- pretty much always given tho (NCFC) - SCC 28, Aug 22, 09:55:15
- How can having one less player not make a difference ? (n/m) (NCFC) - Steve in Holland, Aug 22, 10:41:03
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.