No. You haven't got that straight

You can't get a super-injunction to "cover up any wrong doing".

You can get an injunction if there's no public interest in the story the press are trying to write about you. For example if it's who you're shagging, and there's no public interest in knowing who you're shagging.

"police state info control s**t" is paranoid American ranting. No offence. like.

Posted By: Tricky Hawes on May 10th 2011 at 08:20:05

Message Thread

Super-Injunctions................FFS.... .... (General Chat) - usacanary, May 10, 03:57:39
- Well, that's our socio-political compass straightened out. What's next? (n/m) (General Chat) - Arizona Bay, May 10, 08:56:03
- No. You haven't got that straight (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 10, 08:20:05
- Police state my arse. If they are EVER used to cover up anything remotely newsworthy (General Chat) - megson, May 10, 08:11:43
  - Trafigura... (n/m) (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 10, 08:18:08
    - that's a misunderstanding of what happened though (General Chat) - Tricky Hawes, May 10, 08:28:22
      - There are several superinjunctions currently in effect that are not simply gossip (General Chat) - BerlinCanary, May 10, 09:47:15
      - ah, my bad then - but yeah, your final paragraph i think is exactly where i'm at too (General Chat) - Ralf Scrampton, May 10, 08:32:49
        
        lol. I'm agreed with that final paragraph as well though. (n/m) (General Chat) - megson, May 10, 08:33:44
- The press have brought it on themselves (General Chat) - Ben, May 10, 07:42:13
- I'm not interested in people's private lives. I can only see a case for it if it's a (General Chat) - Bravo win or die, May 10, 07:04:32

Reply to Message

In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.

If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.