that could explain it
if everyone else voted for either Hucks or Dublin then it'd only take your one vote for Shacks to get 3rd
that actually makes more sense than the other explanation that any other supporters actually agreed that Shackell had been our best player this season...
Posted By: blindasabat on April 30th 2007 at 12:52:14
Message Thread
- Player Of The Year Results (NCFC) - samcd84, Apr 30, 11:55:56
- Yes it's strange on the Official site... (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 30, 12:18:06
- Fine tribute to Earnshaw I thought (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 12:04:21
- can't believe Shackell beat him (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Apr 30, 12:14:15
- Because I vote Shacks and (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 30, 12:46:06
- that could explain it (NCFC) - blindasabat, Apr 30, 12:52:14
- Because I vote Shacks and (NCFC) - XXL16, Apr 30, 12:46:06
- Short term memory isnt it? (NCFC) - DiscoDaleGordon, Apr 30, 12:10:07
- But also, Dion saved us when we were heading for the poo (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 30, 12:33:30
- By that reckoning, Martin would get 2nd too though (NCFC) - pants, Apr 30, 12:56:40
- And I'm sure Earnshaw if smart enough to know that (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Apr 30, 12:11:18
- But also, Dion saved us when we were heading for the poo (NCFC) - Old Git, Apr 30, 12:33:30
- can't believe Shackell beat him (n/m) (NCFC) - revsimon, Apr 30, 12:14:15
- 1st=Hucks, 2nd=Dion, 3rd=Shacks (NCFC) - Martin Peters, Apr 30, 11:58:11
- 1) Huckerby 2) Dublin 3) Shackell (n/m) (NCFC) - Brandonio, Apr 30, 11:57:37
- Peter Thorne (n/m) (NCFC) - Brom, Apr 30, 11:56:25
Reply to Message
In order to add a post to the WotB Message Board you must be a registered WotB user.
If you are not yet registered then please visit the registration page. You should ensure that their browser is setup to accept cookies.